Supreme Court’s Decision On Child Rape Law is Flawed

justice kennedyToday, the US Supreme court overturned the Louisiana law permitting the execution of child rapists. (Video Here) The opinion of court, delivered by Justice Kennedy, states that the ruling was made on the basis of the Eighth Amendment. Justices Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer joined the majority opinion while Justices Robert, Scalia, Souter, and Alito, who are conservative Justices, dissented.

It may be argued as to whether or not the death penalty it self is moral. However, the job of the Supreme Court is to interpret the constitution, not to decide upon what is moral and what is not. That decision belongs to the people through a democratic process. This is a case where the court is substituting its own morals for the morals of the people. The decision of the Supreme Court is unconstitutional. Since the death penalty has been ruled as constitutional, then it should be left up to the states to decide what crimes justify the death penalty.

The court arrived at this decision through deciding that a “national consensus” exists, which was derived through the fact that only 6 states allow the death penalty for child rape cases. However, as Justice Alito points out, state legislatures have had to live under the Coker decision for years. The Coker decision said that it was unconstitutional to use the death penalty in cases that involved the raping of an adult woman. They were afraid that any law allowing the death penalty for child rape would be struck down, like it has here. In this case, the fact most of the nation doesn’t allow the death penalty doesn’t show evidence of a national consensus because the states refuse to face the issue. Besides that fact, in the opinion for Coker decision, the word “adult” was used numerous times to describe the rape victim. This was intentional so that the same decision would not be applied to a case involving child rape.

Let’s change our frame of thought for a moment and face this from a moral stand point. In accordance with this decision, Justice Alito writes that a the criminal cannot be sentenced to death “no matter how young the child, no matter how, many times the child is raped, no matter how many children the perpetrator rapes, no matter how sadistic the crime, no matter how much physical or psychological trauma is inflicted, and no matter how heinous the perpetrator’s prior criminal record may be.” What of that? What if the criminal raped multiple children? Still, the court says that it isn’t enough to justify the death penalty.

If were to read the full description of rape and the serious injuries inflicted upon this girl, I guarantee you would be sick to your stomach. There aren’t a lot of things that disturb me. When I read the description of L.H.’s injuries though, I felt as thought someone has torn out my innards. Were I not at work, there probably would have been tears. The court says that in accordance with the 8th amendment, the punishment must be proportional to the crime. What crime, besides murder, is worse than the rape of a child? In fact, it could be argued the raping is child is just as heinous as murder. Who wouldn’t agree that a child rapist lacks just as much of a moral compass as a murderer? I could say that a murder can have a greater morals than any child rapist.

This decision is one that is flawed. This is a decision where the court is using its own morals as a stand-in for the morals of the national consensus. It erodes the power of the states and more importantly, the power of the people. This decision is unquestionably unconstitutional.

Bookmark and Share

Advertisements

5 Responses

  1. Welcome to the blogosphere! Thanks for checking out my site at http://www.prilspen.wordpress.com. Whether you write from a liberal or conservative view, the important thing is to have the conversation – to ask the pertinent questions. Way to go!

  2. Rape in any situation is the act of a coward, raping a child, destroying dreams and ambitions before they can blossom is something that we as a free country should not tolerate. The rights of a convicted child rapist NEVER supersceeds the rights of the child victim. Yet Political correctness in todays society does not support this statement. That to me is sickening. Even criminals do not tolerate child rapists, if the death penalty is not acceptable; tell the general population of the prison yard and let them take care of their own. This might be cold, but it would be justice, where we are limiting our justice system to only interpreting law and not justice.

  3. Wonderful article. I’ll be linking to it, as you put your case much better than I did on the same topic.

  4. […] you’re interested in this topic, please check out this blog, which has a very well thought-out explanation for why this Supreme Court decision is […]

  5. I followed some comments to the Washington Wire and what I read made me sick, so I wrote the following. “forget the politics! What is right and wrong? It is clear that there is no justice in the Justice Department. If you could watch any little girl or boy be sexually brutualized and not step in to stop them but run and call the police what 30 minutes for them to show up, YOU ARE JUST AS GUILTY. Even if it meant my own life I would do anything to stop such a thing. That is called honor, integrity. Anyone who does less is a depraved individual and does not deserve the freedoms bought by the blood of people like me who served to protect this country. I thank God continually that you soft people were not around when this country was formed because it wouldnt be! If we did not have the fortitude to stand up in WW2 we would all be white and speaking German. I consider you ‘people’ cold an

    Comment by JCB – July 3, 2008 at 12:30 pm
    cold and callosed, and not willing to do what is right. Some of you quoted the bible, Thou shall not kill, what about eye for an eye? That is in the Bible. Killing is different than punishment. I would hope that none of you weak things ever have to experience your child brutized while you were tied up in front of them and made to watch. I would hope that no child’s will and innocense is replaced by guilt and self-loathing because their country and society thinks it cruel to punish these monsters. I would hope that no future potential great doctor was raped and detered from inventing a cure for cancer. You people make me sick and disgusted. I feel that 4 generations of my military family members had to spill blood so you could spit on them now.

    Comment by JCB – July 3, 2008 at 12:36 pm “

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: